August 15, 2019


What Was the ADM Jabalpur Case? On 25 June , Prime Minister Indira Gandhi invoked Article and imposed a state of Emergency. Hans Raj Khanna (3 July – 25 February ) was an advocate, jurist and judge. While the Habeas Corpus case is Justice Khanna’s most celebrated ruling, .. “A.D.M. Jabalpur vs Shukla: When the Supreme Court struck down the . PETITIONER: ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JABALPUR Vs. .. The Act in the present case is valid law and it has laid down procedure of applying the.

Author: Fenrinris Tera
Country: Antigua & Barbuda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 13 June 2008
Pages: 470
PDF File Size: 16.19 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.59 Mb
ISBN: 813-1-15702-869-1
Downloads: 64296
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dourr

Khanna had previously authored the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution of India in Kesavananda Bharati v. Just the boldness of single judge is said to be worth perusing and it was in consonance with humanity, freedom and liberty. Justice Khanna’s judgement held that, although the Constitution is amenable to amendments, changes that ultra virestinker with its basic structure [6] cannot be made by Parliament, that is — certain parts of the constitution were “basic” and could not be amended.

But it was an act of weakness on my part.

Hans Raj Khanna – Wikipedia

In he chaired the advisory panel to the Government of India on strengthening the institutions of parliamentary democracy.

The majority judgment was not the correct judgment.

Gill Hafiz Mohamad Ibrahim H. Finally, it was urged that Preamble to the constitution speaks of a Sovereign, Democratic Republic and therefore, the Executive which is subordinate to the Legislature cannot act to the prejudice of the citizen save to the extent permitted by laws validly made by the legislature which is the chosen representative of the people.


Dhar Jyotindra Nath Dixit M. He resigned from its chairmanship in when he was inducted into the cabinet as Union Law Minister by Charan Singh. They were presided over by Soli Sorabjeewho was a very close friend of Justice Khanna’s. Articles and have not been summoned since repudiation of Proclamation of Emergency in and in mid And, as mentioned earlier, all four judges with the exception of Justice Khanna went on to become Chief Justices of India.

Divan 15 March By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

ADM Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC 521

The responsibility of the government to act according to the rules laid down by law and suspension of Article 21 habalpur not by default demand jbalpur adjournment of rule of law. Ramanathan Raja Ramanna C.

There must be an unmistakable overruling of this judgment so that hypothetical nature of Rule of Law can be clarified alongside its applicability to our judicial framework. Karunakaran Lal Krishna Advani M.

He wrote in his dissenting opinion:.

It was presided over by Cqse Ranganath Misra. The war with Pakistan was just ended and the drought were the reasons given by the government for a declaration of emergency, as they were damaged the economic growth and blocked the growth of aadm nation. The family hailed from a trading tradition, but Hans’s father had become a leading lawyer and later, the mayor of Amritsar.

Six other judges in the case were of the view that Parliament’s power was unrestricted.


ADM Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla () 2 SCC – Case Summary

Retrieved from ” https: The wrong elucidation prompted to encroachment of jabapur rights on impulses and favor of a political figure that had her plan to satisfy. The same lecture for the year was delivered by Justice Dipak Misra [25]. Union of India — Delhi Ridge Case. Padma Vibhushan award recipients.

Hans Raj Khanna

He also wrote an autobiography, Neither Roses nor ThornsLucknow, jaabalpur Chadrachud overruled a judgment authored by his father Justice Y. As a judge, the supreme focus is on the benefit of the public or on something which is good for the citizens and jabalput society as a whole but this judgment, seemed to favor only five persons- Indira Gandhi and the other four judges delivering this judgment, including the then Chief Justice of India- Justice A.

Jasbir Singh Bajaj B. Striking a discordant note in the privacy judgment pronounced today, his son Justice D.

He further says that the precedential order issued under article 1 does not give clarity regarding disobeying the parliamentary law. The main issue before their Lordship was whether, in execution of the Presidential Orders when a person was detained, if the High Court can entertain a writ of Habeas Corpus filed by a person challenging the ground for his detention?